When the contract, the indexer and the frontend each keep their own version of state, users see numbers that don't match their wallet
We treat contract events as the only source of truth and derive everything above them from the same indexed history
New features then extend the data layer instead of re-deriving it a slightly different way
Indexers track finality and roll back cleanly instead of accumulating bad state after a reorg
RPC access runs through redundant providers with failover, so a provider incident degrades the product rather than taking it down
So a provider incident looks like slower data to your users rather than a broken product
Teams that split contracts, backend and frontend across vendors usually spend the savings debugging the interfaces between them
We take the whole path from contract event to rendered pixel, so there is one team accountable when something disagrees
Where you already have engineers, we own the onchain and data layers and hand your team a documented interface
Froggik
"DESH Team maintained effective communication throughout the project."
Thanks to DESH Team's work, the client saw increased product recognition within the cryptocurrency community. The team managed the...
Viktoriia Bernatska
Co-Founder
ChainCrafters
"I liked their corporate policy and how they turned to customers and their wishes."
DESH Team delivered the project on time, effectively improving the site's UX and flow. The team took the time to understand the cl...
Kolya Vovkun
CEO, Founder
Dropshipping
"I really like how they treat their clients."
DESH Team successfully completed all deliverables; the branding was a great fit for the client's company, and the website was done...
Tetyana Yarchak
CEO
For us, everything between the contract and the user. That is the onchain logic, the indexing layer that turns events into queryable state, the backend services around it, the frontend that renders it, and the infrastructure that keeps all of it online. Teams that split those across vendors usually spend the savings debugging the seams.
Regularly. The usual shape is that we own the onchain and data layers while your team owns the product surface, with a shared interface contract between them. We work in your repo, your review process and your deployment pipeline rather than asking you to adopt ours.
Ethereum mainnet and the major EVM L2s — Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon — are routine, alongside BNB Chain and Solana. Chain choice affects gas assumptions, oracle availability, finality handling and bridge risk, so we settle it during architecture rather than treating it as a deployment flag.
As expected conditions, not exceptions. Indexers track finality and roll back cleanly on reorgs instead of accumulating bad state. RPC access runs through redundant providers with failover, and the frontend distinguishes pending, replaced and reverted transactions so users are told the truth about what happened.
Yes, and it starts with a read rather than a rewrite. We map what is deployed, what is tested and what is undocumented, then come back with a plan that separates what must change for safety from what can be improved over time. Rewrites are a last resort, not an opening move.
